Tuesday 20 October 2009

ASIO sent home without questioning - again

as posted here


Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Tuesday 20th October 2009, 4:58pm
in 
Greens senator Scott Ludlam has demanded a rethink of Senate estimates programming after ASIO once again escaped Senate scrutiny during hearings yesterday.
"It is unacceptable that ASIO has appeared only once in the last four Estimates sessions," said Senator Ludlam, Australian Greens spokesperson on Attorney General's issues.
"I have formally complained to the Senate committee today to ensure that next time around these important agencies are at the front of the program.
"Last night the committee sent ASIO home, yet again, without anyone being given the opportunity to speak with them. Next year it is essential they appear earlier in the programme.
"ASIO is one of the least accountable agencies in the country. Opportunities to question them on their activities are very rare, and last night another opportunity was squandered.
"Is ASIO reconsidering the design of its gargantuan and very expensive new building in response to the sustained public outcry, including from the Walter Burley Griffin Society and prominent architects?
Is the cost of the facility on track or are we heading for a blowout?
"ASIO is one of the only parts of the public service that is recruiting and not cutting staff. Over a period of four years ASIO staffing rose from 800 to about 1600. By the end of 2010 it will reach approximately 1800."
"How do the Australian public know if they are getting value for the significant funding increases that have accelerated since 2005?"
Media enquiries please call Fernando de Freitas on 0417 174 302


as posted here

Spokesperson for the Tamils stranded in West Java reveals a potential bombshell

as posted here

From the newswire: On last night's Indymedia Radical Radio Show, Alex, spokesperson for the 260 Tamil asylum seekers on board the ship moored at Merak port in West Java, revealed that a woman falsely claiming to be a representative of the Australian government had gained access to the boat. Alex told Indymedia, "There was an Australian woman who falsely claimed herself to be a representative of the Australian Embassy and she was the first [person] the Indonesian police brought on board the vessel...however, she was unable to provide us with any ID and the lady did confirm later on that she was not a representative of the Australian Embassy. The Indonesian police should [investigate] to find out what's going on."

The revelation is potentially explosive and raises a whole series of questions: why did the Indonesian authorities allow the woman to board the vessel without official identification? Who was she? What business did she have boarding the ship? Is there a possibility she was acting covertly on behalf of the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Secret Intelligence Service?

This information has not been revealed in any other media outlet and demands an immediate investigation given the distinct possibility the woman in question was spying on the asylum seekers on behalf of the Australian government. 


as posted here

Delusions of terror

as posted here


Sally Neighbour | October 20, 2009
Article from: The Australian
HIS wife describes a loving husband. A psychiatric report reveals a violent upbringing, serious teenage drug abuse and a descent into chronic mental illness. The police record shows a history of juvenile delinquency, a string of minor adult convictions and, finally, a guilty plea to a charge of preparing for a terrorist act.
The life and crimes of 28-year-old Hussein (not his real name), co-accused in Sydney's recent marathon terror trial, provide a compelling portrait of the making of a terrorist and the formation of a terror cell. Hussein was one of four men to plead guilty last year, while another five were convicted last week on the charge of preparing what the authorities said could have been a "catastrophic" attack.
NSW Supreme Court judge Anthony Whealy, who presided over the trial and the sentencing of the four who pleaded guilty before the trial began, said Hussein and his co-conspirators were devout Muslims who believed Islam was under attack, it was their obligation to defend it, and the primary means of doing so was jihad, which included the killing of "infidels".
Hussein was born in Australia to Lebanese parents in 1981. He had a difficult relationship with his father which, in Whealy's words, included "considerable violence". He was expelled from school in year 9 for violent conduct and fell into "bad company", juvenile crime and heavy use of amphetamines, ecstasy and LSD.
He was diagnosed with depression at 18. The judge said his drug use was a "significant factor" in the subsequent onset of hallucinations, delusions and paranoia, and ultimately a diagnosis of schizophrenia in 2002.
Married under Islamic law to an Australian Muslim convert, Hussein worked intermittently as a labourer in the building industry but ended up on a disability support pension, unable to work. He turned to religion for solace and support.
The psychologist who interviewed him in prison wrote: "After he began to realise he had a problem, he began to hang out with Muslims. They reminded him of God. He attended mosque regularly (because) this made him relaxed."
Hussein attended the Haldon Street prayer room in Lakemba, which was a magnet for a crowd of similarly lost souls. Many of them were former street hoodlums with a history of drug use and petty crime who had turned to Islam to straighten out their lives.
He gravitated to a group of like-minded men from similar backgrounds, who embraced the aggressive and empowering brand of Islam that was popular among some who frequented the prayer room.
The path to radicalisation for young men such as Hussein and his cohorts is well trodden. It is described in a police intelligence report, which led to the Sydney cell's arrest.
"Belonging to a jihadi group can instil in its members a sense of empowerment, control and purpose that few experience outside this collective ... the life of a jihadi allows theindividual to form a perception of their new self, frequently in contrast to their previous existence, as someone of importance and influence."
Their new-found self-esteem is further enhanced by a conviction that they are "doing God's work", the report says.
"An opinion that one is protecting victimised Muslims throughout the world can instil a feeling of exclusivity, elevating one's own sense of self-importance and purpose."
The report says these individuals undergo "a cognitive transformation" that allows them to embrace "a world view which makes violence not only acceptable but also an absolute necessity".
In addition to rookies such as Hussein, the crowd at the prayer room included a group of older men who had already embraced the concept of militant jihad.
They included one man, convicted last week, who had been under surveillance since at least 2000, when the remnants of a military-style training camp were found on a rural property owned by his family in NSW.
Another was a Bangladeshi-born man, also convicted last week, who was under watch for his links with the Indonesian militant group Jemaah Islamiah and the French terrorist Willie Brigitte.
Two other men who cannot be named were on the ASIO watch-list, because both were believed to have trained with the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba.
This hard core of radicals believed Australia was a "land of war", which made it an enemy because Australian troops were involved in fighting Muslims overseas.
In January 2005, Hussein was heard in a covertly recorded conversation with one of his co-conspirators discussing the role of Australian forces in Iraq, Afghanistan and East Timor, and referring to Australia as "a stuffed-up country" and "the sons of dogs".
One of the men who pleaded guilty, who cannot be named for legal reasons, told a forensic psychologist in prison that the events of September 11, 2001, had a profound impact on him. He was visited twice by ASIO officers, apparently because he was known to attend the Lakemba prayer room. He said he began to worry about his family's safety and about what he saw as the persecution of Muslims worldwide.
The psychologist wrote: "He began to question the morality and motives of world powers and the situation of Muslims worldwide. In the context of the group of young Muslim men who centred on the mosque he said his consciousness was heightened and he interpreted things he heard as justifying retribution."
The man who, like Hussein, had a history of family violence and drug abuse, told the psychologist "his religious fervour became a vehicle for past unresolved anger about his own life".
It was the London bombings of July 7, 2005, in which 52 people were killed, that triggered this individual into action, according to the psychologist's report.
"He recalls being impressed by the impact that event had on London. He understood from news reports that the city was brought to a standstill and the communication network was disabled ... He was struck by the magnitude of the impact and thought it had probably made many more people aware of the plight of the people of Iraq and the interference of the United States."
He claimed his intention was to create the same impact without claiming casualties.
"(He) said he thought if he could do something similar in Australia without hurting people, it would extend awareness of aggression against Muslims and alert Australians to oppose the government and stop the nation's alliance with the United States."
The man told the psychologist he researched the London bombings and found that hydrogen peroxide was an ingredient in the explosive TATP, known as "the mother of Satan". He said he became obsessed with collecting bottles of the chemical. He claimed he had no idea what he would do with it but felt he was "doing something".
"I felt a sense of satisfaction ... it was letting out my anger," he said. At the same time, others in the cell were placing orders for hundreds of litres of chemicals that are known precursors for the high-powered explosives favoured by terrorists.
In October 2005, in one of the final acts of the terror conspiracy, Hussein was filmed on a CCTV camera in a suburban BigW store in Sydney, accompanied by two of his co-conspirators. He had stolen six clocks and 140 batteries and hidden them in an empty box. He later confessed that the theft constituted an act in preparation for a terrorist act.
Whealy said the items Hussein had stolen were "capable of constructing six timed explosive devices, each of which could have detonated a number of explosive devices, which could have caused at least serious damage to property and possible loss of life".
The judge found there was no evidence that any target had been selected but said this did not mitigate the criminality of the terrorists in preparing for such an act.
Hussein was sentenced last month to seven years in prison with a minimum of five years and three months, discounted because of his mental illness. Whealy said it may be the case, as Hussein's lawyer argued, that he was influenced by others who took advantage of his mental illness, but added there was no evidence to support this.
His non-parole period ended last week and he was released the day before five of his co-accused were convicted.
The psychologist who examined him said that as a result of finally receiving appropriate medical treatment, the 28-year-old had made a "remarkable recovery" from his mental illness, which his lawyer claimed was a significant factor in his crimes.
He said that Hussein was now a "remarkably different person" no longer holds extreme religious views and is unlikely to further offend.
Hussein's wife told the court that the couple wished to move to the country make a new start in life.
She said her husband regrets having missed out on his married life during the four years he spent in prison, and wants to start a career and make something of himself.
She added that she is prepared to support him and that there are "many people who love and care for him".
In handing down the sentence that allowed Hussein to be freed last week, Whealy accepted there is some evidence he has moved away from his former extremist views, but cautioned that if he returns to the mosque, he and his family will have to take "special care" that he is not exposed to extremist influence.
Australia's counter-terrorism authorities will no doubt be paying very close attention to his every future move.
Sally Neighbour is a senior reporter with The Australian and ABC's Four Corners and author of In the Shadow of Swords and The Mother of Hussein.


as posted here

Judges and juries called it as they saw it

as posted here


Last week the ABC 702 radio presenter Deborah Cameron referred to the "so-called terror trial in Parramatta". On Friday, after deliberating for over a month, a jury at the Supreme Court returned guilty verdicts against five men on terrorism charges. The jurors were unaware that four other men, charged following the same police investigation, had already pleaded guilty and had been sentenced.
Clearly the jury was convinced, beyond reasonable doubt, that the five men acted in the preparation of a terrorist act. Certainly the evidence, albeit circumstantial, was overwhelming. There were numerous intercepted conversations and telephone buggings and some of the men had collected large quantities of weapons and ammunition, along with chemicals that could be used in constructing explosive devices.
What was a "so-called terror trial" to an ABC presenter in Ultimo was the real thing to the men and women of the jury in Parramatta.
In her initial report of the jury's decision on The World Today on Friday, Philippa McDonald, even after the guilty findings, was still referring to what had been "alleged" against the men. She editorialised the case was "hugely circumstantial" and maintained it "had to be said that, for a lot of the Crown case, the defence came back with something else".
There is considerable evidence that members of what is best termed the civil liberties lobby - including some journalists, lawyers and academics - do not want to accept that a few men in Western societies want to engage in violent jihad. The evident cynicism is not confined to Australia but extends to Britain and the United States, where acts of violence by militant Islamists have occurred.
Writing in The Australian in 2006, Phillip Adams identified with the cynics within the left and the Muslim world concerning the reported attempt to use liquid explosives to bring down seven airliners flying from Heathrow in Britain to the US and Canada. He went so far as to hint all this might have been a distraction to divert attention from the political difficulties of the then British Labour prime minister, Tony Blair.
Antony Loewenstein, a high-profile critic of Israel, supported Adams in the Crikey newsletter. Loewenstein maintained the Heathrow incident might have been a political concoction.
Once again, a jury found otherwise. Last month, three British Muslims were convicted of planning a series of suicide/homicide attacks against trans-Atlantic airlines. The case was documented in the first-class BBC Panorama documentaryTerror in the Skies, shown here on Four Corners last month. The program showed the "suicide" videos recorded by the terrorists before the intended attacks were thwarted by British police and intelligence services.
The evidence suggests the threat to Australia from local citizens and residents is less than in Britain or the US. Even so, it is real enough as several recent cases - before last week's verdict - attest.
- On September 25, Justice Megan Latham sentenced Bilal Khazal to a non-parole period of nine years. Khazal had been found guilty by a jury of the offence of making a document connected with assistance in a terrorist act. The judge found the prisoner had not demonstrated any remorse or contrition.
- On September 2, in the Victorian Supreme Court, Justice Bernard Bongiorno sentenced Shane Kent, who had pleaded guilty to being a member of a terrorist organisation and making a document connected with preparation for a terrorist act, to a non-parole period of three years and nine months. The judge noted that Kent, a convert to Islam, was not contrite for his actions. Moreover, he did not accept that Kent had abandoned the cause of violent jihad.
- On February 3, Bongiorno sentenced seven men who had been found guilty in Victoria of knowingly being members of a terrorist organisation. Some of this group were also convicted of other terrorism offences. In handing down his sentences, the judge commented about the unwillingness of the prisoners to renounce violent jihad.
- Justice Anthony Whealy made a similar finding when sentencing Faheem Lodhi, in the NSW Supreme Court in 2006, to a non-parole period of 15 years for a terrorism- related offence.
It is not as if those convicted of terrorism offences in Australia in recent years have come up against an unfair system - despite complaints reported in the media by some of their family members and supporters. In all the cases cited above, judges have gone out of their way to ensure a fair trial. And juries have exercised considerable caution, including reaching some "not guilty" findings. Also, Justices Bongiorno and Whealy expressed valid concerns about the extremely harsh conditions experienced by some prisoners.
The fact is that guilty verdicts have been reached, and relatively tough sentences handed out, on account of evidence which led to convictions beyond reasonable doubt. ASIO, the Australian Federal Police and state police forces tend to receive criticism. However, the convictions in the terrorism-related cases in both NSW and Victoria demonstrate that Australia's intelligence and police services have done a first-rate job in protecting the liberties of all of us.
The same can be said for our politicians. The present terrorism legislation is the product of agreement between the Coalition and Labor in Parliament. Most - if not all - of the convictions have been assisted by the much derided terrorism help-line set up by the Howard government. Among those providing evidence against terrorism have been Australian Muslims. Clearly, they are not convinced that terrorism deserves the "so-called" label.
Gerard Henderson is executive director of The Sydney Institute.


as posted here