"My first reason for suggesting that the evidence should be rejected is that in the early 1950s any fool would have known that ASIO would have such a premises under surveillance, so it was hardly a state secret, but in any event clearly that information could only be a leak from ASIO itself, and again any fool would know that ASIO did not leak to either Evatt or Dalziel."
No comments:
Post a Comment
comments will be moderated before posting, allow some time before they appear if they are accepted ...